JFK: THE CIA, VIETNAM AND THE PLOT TO ASSASSINATE JOHN F. KENNEDY

by L. Fletcher Prouty

L. Fletcher Prouty was Mr. X, Oliver Stone’s version of “deep throat” in the movie “JFK.” Prouty was “a retired colonel of the US Air Force, jet pilot, and former professor of air science and tactics at Yale University….during the Kennedy years, [he] served as the chief of special operations for the Joint Chiefs of Staff. He was directly in charge of the global system designed to provide military support for the clandestine activities of the CIA.” (From the book jacket.)

While those credentials can give Prouty a tremendous amount of credibility, they can also throw up a red flag. Something like this–a tell-all by someone associated with the intelligence community–almost always spells disinformation in my experience. Furthermore, it was first published as a serial by the Church of Scientology. That in itself is not enough for me to dismiss the book’s veracity–I know a few Scientologists and they are not as nutty as they are made out to be, however, I have read convincing reports that L. Ron Hubbard was a government operative whose personal history was a “legacy” created for him by Intelligence and whose operations were fronts for psychological experimentation. Therefore, it is somewhat suspect to me that this work by a special operations chief first appeared in a Scientology publication, and I must consider the possibility that this book is in fact disinformation. On the other hand, if this is not disinfo, then Prouty is a courageous hero who should be honored. It’s a tough call!

No matter which way Prouty shakes out, though, good disinformation is still mostly true. This is necessary to establish veracity and can be described as a “limited hangout,” in which the intelligence community deems that it is worth saying some things against interest in order to drive home critical disinfo. My goal in examining a work like this is to take from it the real information, the stuff they are “hanging out,” while not falling for the disinformation.

With that in mind, let me share with you what, to the best of my judgment, are profound truths found in this book. Specifically, what drives the power elite? And how exactly does the CIA micromanage events to serve their goals?

What drives the power elite?

Prouty claims that the power elite spans countries and creeds and surely it does. He gives no more detail than that, thereafter using Winston Churchill’s nebulous name for it: the High Cabal. So, while he doesn’t tell us who they are, he does tell us their underlying assumptions, which do seem to explain the direction modern history has taken. In Prouty’s words:

The power elite is…influenced by the persuasion of a quartet of the greatest propaganda schemes ever put forth by man:

1. The concept of “real property,” a function of “colonialism” that began with the circumnavigation of Earth by Magellan’s ships in 1520. A “doctrine of discovery and rights of conquest” was described by John Locke in his philosophy of natural law.

2. The population theory of Malthus.

3. Darwins’ theory of evolution, as enhanced by the concept of the survival of the fittest.

4. Heisenberg’s theory of indeterminancy, that is, that God throws the dice, and similar barriers to the real advancement of science and technology today.

Although all four of Prouty’s points are fundamental, the first one was the only one that was totally new to me. As an anarcho-capitalist, I believe in absolute property rights and I don’t believe the government has any right whatsoever to infringe upon them, but there is always the question of where property rights originate, particularly in land. Locke’s idea, to simplify, was that mixing toil with soil yielded land ownership and I’ve accepted that, but with nagging reservations. If a hunter-gatherer society claims a territory, is it theirs? They are actually parasites on the land and do not mix their toil with the soil, but do they have rights of occupation? If not, what then justifies claiming territory such as the Louisiana Purchase and selling it off to speculators before any of the parties involved had ever even stepped foot on that land, much less mixed toil with soil?

As an American, these questions remained for me highly theoretical because land was effectively limitless for anyone who actually did want to mix toil with soil to get it. England, on the other hand, seems to derive its class system from inherited property without questioning the origin of the property rights that buoy their upper classes from generation to generation.* But that’s their problem—or so I thought. Prouty claims that the original worldwide seizure of real property following Magellan’s historic voyage is the bedrock of today’s power structure.

It may be postulated that this single bit of physical awareness brought about the greatest change in the mind of man since the dawn of creation…From that date on (circa AD 1520), the powerful rulers of the seafaring countries assumed the ownership of all real property in those discovered lands, and the natural resources on that property became one of the driving forces of mankind.

To clarify, once Magellan made clear that ships could circumnavigate the Earth, it became self-evident there was a finite surface area and the greatest of the western powers determined to claim it all through colonization. This method was not simply a matter of sending pilgrims abroad to mix their toil with soil. As Prouty puts it, “The power centers of that period were taking over the real property of the world—no matter who was on it or who had been living there—using little more than the surveyor’s chain, the missionary’s cross, and the explorers’ gun.”

While Prouty’s critique might sound like a call to so-called social justice (a fraudulent movement that I detest), one must not ignore real injustices merely because they are exploited by ideological rivals, especially when those injustices continue to defile not only our own economic and personal liberties, but those of the most powerless around the world. The process Prouty describes continues today as the IMF, transnational corporations and the rest engage in neo-colonialism, a coercive and fraudulent cronyism that unfairly takes and besmirches the name of capitalism in an effort to gain control of resources and stifle local competition in under-developed countries.

How on Earth does this all relate to who killed JFK? It sets the stage for the who, what and why of world power, money and politics, and justifies the theory that JFK’s decision to withdraw from Viet Nam would have interfered with a centuries old process of cronyism, colonization and transformation around the world by a power elite he could not dominate.

What really happened in Viet Nam?

Several times in this book, Prouty refers to The Report from Iron Mountain, a “novelized” account of a study group commissioned during the JFK administration that addressed the question, if there is no war, will there still be a way to control society? The answer: “No.” The report claims that if a major leader is unable to garner support for a “desired war,” the results would be “catastrophic.” This could not be allowed. When I first read this, I recalled how Obama tried and failed (yes, he DID try), to start a war with Syria in August 2013. That’s when I knew he (“they”) would keep trying until they succeeded, and they have. But I had failed to make the connection that The Report might have been referring to JFK himself–perhaps he was the leader who failed to conduct a desired war, not because he couldn’t garner public support for it, but because he himself did not support it. If that were the case, he might have had to go. The CIA had put a lot of effort over two decades into manufacturing war in Viet Nam and no mere elected official was going to derail it.

As an Air Force pilot and a special operations chief, Prouty was on the scene beginning in the 1940s straight through the 1960s observing and participating in the machinations of the CIA in creating conflict in Viet Nam. The most significant activities in this regard, according to Prouty, are:

(1) Bringing arms from the Pacific theater at the end of World War II into both Korea and Viet Nam – arms that Ho Chi Minh later used in his communist conquest of Viet Nam.

(2) The US government’s physical relocation of totally non-political villagars (Tonkinese)–1.1 million of them–from the North Viet Nam to South Viet Nam. These refugees, supported by our puppet government in the south, displaced local natives (Cochinese) who had occupied the land for tens of thousands of years, driving them into the forests to be falsely labeled “Viet Cong.”

(3) The lawlessness created by the displaced Cochinese was exacerbated when the new South Viet Namese government ordered all French officials (the only law and order in the country) to leave.

(4) Finally, economic devastation ensued when that same South Viet Namese government (our puppet government), made the Chinese merchants and traders leave. Rice rotted on the docks and natives were unable to trade for the necessities of life.

According to Prouty, these were some of the ways the CIA deliberately created upheaval in Viet Nam to intensify conflict and suck the US military into a war there with purposes ranging from societal transformation to creating demand for helicopters. This war, and the big spending that was to become associated with it, was an indispensable part of the military-industrial complex’s plan for post-World War II America.

Conclusion

L. Fletcher Prouty makes a coherent, convincing case that JFK was killed by the CIA in the service of the “High Cabal” for disrupting a 20 year effort to conduct war in Viet Nam, generate defense spending and debt, and transform peoples and politics in Asia. I’m sure I wouldn’t agree with Prouty’s politics, so I take his prescriptions and social judgments with a grain of salt, nonetheless, I found his narrative compelling and plausible.

Although my usual purpose in reviewing books like this one is to identify and distill the critical points the author has made so busy, working people can stay informed without having to slog through pages and pages of nonfiction. In this case, however, I recommend you read it yourself. It’s a very well-written, well-edited narrative that goes into just enough detail to be convincing and explanatory without going into so much detail that the narrative is lost. Even if the purpose of the book is to throw us off the scent of who the “High Cabal” really is, there is enough truth and insight in it to qualify as a must read.

Related posts:
NB These were both posted before I ever even heard of L. Fletcher Prouty….
What’s at the bottom of the rabbit hole? The Report from Iron Mountain.
CFR ==> CIA ==> JFK ==>

*Since writing this review, I read a good little article about the origin of property ownership in the English aristocracy: Downton Abbey’s Dirty Secret

This entry was posted in conspiracies, conspiracy, crony capitalism, jfk, original articles, recommended reading. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to JFK: THE CIA, VIETNAM AND THE PLOT TO ASSASSINATE JOHN F. KENNEDY

  1. hugh says:

    Indeed, Monica, your review certainly whets the appetite! I had no idea of some of the details of the Viet Nam war. This should cause everyone to question all that goes on today!!! And I much appreciate you expanding on the techniques employed by the propagandists as I still know so many otherwise intelligent folks that don’t have a clue that they are being manipulated. I assume this book can be found on Amazon? p.s. I have sort of bought into the ‘Malthus Theory’, though I can’t say I’ve spent much time considering it. Appears I should further evaluate my thinking?

    • austrogirl says:

      Ever since crop yields were quadrupled in the the 60s, Malthus became obsolete…current food production technology could yield enough for 14 billion people and the population is expected to top out at 11 billion if not less. Also, if you click on the picture of the book above, it will shoot you right to amazon page for it. I posted a picture of the edition I read, but it looks like there is a newer version out there 🙂

      • hugh says:

        Is Malthus obsolete? I’m not so sure, or at least there might be a corollary to his thinking that holds true, and that would be the sustainability of a population with it’s resources. Ironically, as you responded to my earlier comment, I received an article by email that relates to Malthus and the sustainability question. The link follows below and I believe it is worth consideration. And I would add as a sidenote that Monsanto et al certainly push hard that we won’t be able to feed the earth’s populations unless we wholeheartedly accept the GMOs, which are flat out poisions, in my opinion. Three cheers for Putin’s Russia as they are banning GMOs!

        http://www.culturechange.org/cms/content/view/925/1/

  2. hugh says:

    I just finished watching a nine part video series “The Men Who Killed Kennedy”. The link to part one is copied below and subsequent parts will be available as the viewer progresses through the clips. I can not overemphasize the importance of viewing this information. If we ever want to reclaim our nation, this is one extremely important event that must be understood. And those today who continue to obstruct justice must be held accountable. And that relates to not just the Kennedy Assassination, but to all subsequent travesties that appear to follow in the same mold…think 9-11, Boston, Sandy Hook, Flight 800, Flight MH17………. Does everyone see why this is so important? The evil doers have a model where they can lie and cover-up at will. This cycle must be exposed and stopped!

  3. hugh says:

    To emphasize why it is so important to ‘out the truth’ and hold accountable the individuals and organizations involved in the JFK Assassination and cover-up, we only need to consider what is happening today re the Malaysian Flight 17 investigation. You will recall 298 passengers and crew died in that crash. It appears the nation of Malaysia is intentionally excluded from the joint investigation. One would think Malaysia would have standing to be involved, if any party would! Please see the explanatory article attached via the link provided below. In my opinion, the United States Government is officially tampering with a complete and honest murder investigation. I am not schooled in the law, but that would appear to indicate a very serious crime might be occurring right before our eyes. Does this not remind everyone of the JFK Warren Commission, and other similar shams since then?!

    http://journal-neo.org/2014/11/28/mh17-malaysia-s-barring-from-investigation-reeks-of-cover-up/

    • hugh says:

      CORRECTION to my last post. I need to change my opinion re the U.S. Government’s involvment in this matter from ‘official’ to ‘unofficial’ as I had mistakenly indicted the U.S. was part of the formal investigation team. They are not. But everything else I stand by and I firmly believe we are up to our eyeballs in this cover-up!

    • hugh says:

      Good News for a change! The pressure of the alternative media has forced the hand of those trying to sabotage the investigation and now Malaysia is included in. Just hope it’s not too late to reconstruct what really happened to MH17! A link to this information follows immediately below:

      http://russia-insider.com/en/2014/12/09/05-36-30pm/alternative_media_and_mh17_jit_reversal

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s