This is the only flag I own…https://www.facebook.com/160336360732684/photos/pb.160336360732684.-2207520000.1435619946./604534196312896/?type=3&src=https%3A%2F%2Fscontent-sjc2-1.xx.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-xfp1%2Fv%2Ft1.0-9%2F10366149_604534196312896_2326847684722108380_n.jpg%3Foh%3D690a5bd5eabbd2f27341f30c001c894c%26oe%3D56274C48&size=537%2C720&fbid=604534196312896
Here is the video preview of the show:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXMmXrY-hYI
Here is this week’s podcast:
Hour 1
Hour 2
Hour 3
Here is the podcast of my original show on the TPP and also of my show on the USA Freedom Act:
https://monicaperezshow.com/2015/06/15/tpp-ttip-the-tipping-points-podcast-of-june-13-2015-show/
https://monicaperezshow.com/2015/05/20/usa-freedom-act-not-so-much-podcast-of-may-16-2015-show/
Jeff Sessions’ Press Releases on TPP:
http://www.sessions.senate.gov/public/?p=search&num=10&filter=0&q=tpp
The Trilateral Commission on how to undermine democracy:
“The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power; political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateral Commission intends is to create a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nationstates involved. As managers and creators of the system, they will rule the future.” ~Barry Goldwater in his l979 book: With No Apologies
“This regionalization is in keeping with the Tri-Lateral Plan which calls for a gradual convergence of East and West, ultimately leading toward the goal of one world government. National sovereignty is no longer a viable concept.” Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Carter’s National Security Advisor and a founding member of David Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission.
The economist quote the caller was searching for? “What’s just has been debated for centuries, but let me offer you my definition of social justice: I keep what I earn and you keep what you earn. Do you disagree? Well, then, tell me how much of what I earn belongs to you – and why?” ~Walter Williams http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2013/06/18/the-20-greatest-quotes-from-walter-williams-n1621952/page/full
Here is my review of the JFK book I mentioned on the air:
JFK: THE CIA, VIETNAM AND THE PLOT TO ASSASSINATE JOHN F. KENNEDY
New entries this week to my glossary: Rahm Emanuel 3.0, or “Crisis Initiation” (be sure to watch the short videos embedded in the glossary!)
Down the rabbit hole on the Charleston shooting with RedSilverJ…
https://www.youtube.com/user/ReviewManify
Here is the Judge Napolitano article on speech of governments vs speech of private individuals and enterprises: Protecting Hatred Preserves Freedom..I would add, the government should not make a political statement with a Confederate flag over the Capitol nor with colored lights shining on the White House. Chick Fil A should be able to have a Confederate flag over corporate headquarters or the owners of the Empire State Building should be able to light it up in rainbow colors if they want. Private businesses usually don’t make divisive political statements, however, because they want to serve everyone—something this two party system of government works against.
Here is an easy fast read I liked about the Constitution by Judge Napolitano – I recommend digging much deeper, but it’s a good start:
Here are the articles that make me wonder if the Sons of Confederate Veterans was deliberately infiltrated and transformed from being an organization to maintain Confederate graveyards to “fighting for the right to display Confederate symbols everywhere from schools to statehouses.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sons_of_Confederate_Veterans#History
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:R3lAcU4qqukJ:www.ydr.com/newsfull/ci_4281822+%22sons+of+confederate+veterans%22+factions&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=11
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Wilson_(politician)
Here is the excerpt from a mainstream news article that I read on the air:
“…when asked about one of Georgia’s two statues in the U.S. Capitol – that of Alexander Stephens – Lewis turned steely, and made clear he wants that marble likeness replaced by his state legislature.
“I want to see it go,” Lewis said. “I don’t like taking young people on a tour and telling them that this was the Vice President of the Confederacy.”
“We have to get our own house in order,” Lewis said. “We have to have a cleansing in this place.”
Stephens may be best known for a speech he gave in Savannah, Georgia before the shooting started in the Civil War – known as the “Cornerstone Speech” – in which he bluntly set out the differences between North and South.
“They assume that the negro is equal, and hence conclude that he is entitled to equal privileges and rights with the white man,” Stephens said of slavery opponents.
“Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite idea; its foundations are laid, its cornerstone rests upon the great truth, that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery – subordination to the superior race – is his natural and normal condition,” Stephens continued.
But the real context of the speech was not laying out the difference between North & South or between slave-holders and abolitionists, but between the founders of the Confederacy and Thomas Jefferson and most of the Founders of the United States! Here is the full context…
The new constitution has put at rest, forever, all the agitating questions relating to our peculiar institution — African slavery as it exists amongst us — the proper status of the negro in our form of civilization. This was the immediate cause of the late rupture and present revolution. Jefferson in his forecast, had anticipated this, as the “rock upon which the old Union would split.” He was right. What was conjecture with him, is now a realized fact. But whether he fully comprehended the great truth upon which that rock stood and stands, may be doubted. The prevailing ideas entertained by him and most of the leading statesmen at the time of the formation of the old constitution, were that the enslavement of the African was in violation of the laws of nature; that it was wrong in principle, socially, morally, and politically. It was an evil they knew not well how to deal with, but the general opinion of the men of that day was that, somehow or other in the order of Providence, the institution would be evanescent and pass away. This idea, though not incorporated in the constitution, was the prevailing idea at that time. The constitution, it is true, secured every essential guarantee to the institution while it should last, and hence no argument can be justly urged against the constitutional guarantees thus secured, because of the common sentiment of the day. Those ideas, however, were fundamentally wrong. They rested upon the assumption of the equality of races. This was an error. It was a sandy foundation, and the government built upon it fell when the “storm came and the wind blew.”
Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite idea; its foundations are laid, its corner- stone rests upon the great truth, that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery — subordination to the superior race — is his natural and normal condition.
I didn’t understand the distinction the caller was making about the stars and bars…this should clear it up… 